We've been using the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED exclusively as a productivity monitor for the last six months,关键字3 and it's time to check in to see how the panel is holding up in terms of burn-in. Not much has changed in how we've been using this monitor – we've really been pushing it with a worst-case usage scenario for OLED – but there have been a few changes compared to the last time we checked for burn-in.

If you missed the last two updates, we recommend going back and checking out at least the initial article to get an idea of the setup we're using and why we've chosen MSI's 4K 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor as our workstation display.

Essentially, the idea here is to perform a real-world test of OLED longevity in the worst possible configuration, effectively burning in the display on purpose. We swapped a 32-inch 4K IPS LCD for this new QD-OLED and changed nothing else about the setup – no dark mode, no screensavers, or anything like that – to see if OLED monitors can truly be used as LCD-equivalent productivity displays long-term.

I use my monitor more than 8 hours a day, sometimes continuously, with no breaks for the display to turn off and rest. This leads to hours upon hours of static usage in applications like web browsers, Microsoft Office (including Excel), and production tasks like Adobe Premiere and Photoshop. With virtually no content consumption and zero gaming in our daily use of this display, this is not how we recommend usingan OLED at all, though it's a use case that has been perfectly fine for LCDs for a long time.

After one month of usage, the MSI 321URX showed no signs of burn-in at all, which was expected. At that point, we'd used the monitor for about 200 to 250 hours. After three months, we started to see faint signs of burn-in, and by that time, we'd used the display for approximately 650 to 750 hours with 71 panel compensation cycles.

Six months into this experiment, we estimate the usage to be between 1,200 and 1,500 hours, and the monitor indicates that it has run 141 compensation cycles. This aligns with what we reported previously – about double the usage and about double the compensation cycles. We're still seeing around 9 to 10 hours of usage at 200 nits of brightness per compensation cycle.

As we mentioned in the last update, the recommended rate for panel protection cycles is every four hours, so in our typical usage, it's running less than half as often as is ideal. However, this is a totally realistic scenario for someone using this display for full-time work, especially if you don't put the monitor to sleep during breaks. We've set the display to sleep after two hours, which is far longer than we would recommend for general OLED use, but it's the same setting we used for our LCD.

• ·โฆษก กต.แถลงความคืบหน้าประชุม JBC ชี้สองฝ่ายมีท่าทีเปิดกว้าง
• ·高玩对各职业的懂得共享
• ·《机甲战魔 神话之裔》融合系统详细介绍影片公开！
• ·兵士并不是任人欺侮的职业
• ·2025高中语文名著必读 值得推荐的有哪些
• ·《不再想你》(红蔷薇演唱)的文本歌词及LRC歌词
• ·中马协三级技术官员培训考核在海南文昌市长驰国际马术俱乐部举办
• ·系统加速解决方案之Windows2003
• ·李前平：老兵化身“白蚁战士”
• ·AI创新课堂进入《超级语文课》第四季 支教老师匠心诠释语文深度
• ·碧桂园股票股价大跌6% 公告称杨惠妍公司与高盛签订配售及认购协议
• ·有关爱国的名人名言（4篇）
• ·思想作风教育整顿自查自纠报告
• ·商量法师是否抑制道士这个烦恼
• ·火影：开局打破笼中鸟，震惊宗家
• ·受强降雨影响，铁路上海站部分旅客列车停运（附停运车次）