We've been using the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED exclusively as a productivity monitor for the last six months,关键字2 and it's time to check in to see how the panel is holding up in terms of burn-in. Not much has changed in how we've been using this monitor – we've really been pushing it with a worst-case usage scenario for OLED – but there have been a few changes compared to the last time we checked for burn-in.

If you missed the last two updates, we recommend going back and checking out at least the initial article to get an idea of the setup we're using and why we've chosen MSI's 4K 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor as our workstation display.

Essentially, the idea here is to perform a real-world test of OLED longevity in the worst possible configuration, effectively burning in the display on purpose. We swapped a 32-inch 4K IPS LCD for this new QD-OLED and changed nothing else about the setup – no dark mode, no screensavers, or anything like that – to see if OLED monitors can truly be used as LCD-equivalent productivity displays long-term.

I use my monitor more than 8 hours a day, sometimes continuously, with no breaks for the display to turn off and rest. This leads to hours upon hours of static usage in applications like web browsers, Microsoft Office (including Excel), and production tasks like Adobe Premiere and Photoshop. With virtually no content consumption and zero gaming in our daily use of this display, this is not how we recommend usingan OLED at all, though it's a use case that has been perfectly fine for LCDs for a long time.

After one month of usage, the MSI 321URX showed no signs of burn-in at all, which was expected. At that point, we'd used the monitor for about 200 to 250 hours. After three months, we started to see faint signs of burn-in, and by that time, we'd used the display for approximately 650 to 750 hours with 71 panel compensation cycles.

Six months into this experiment, we estimate the usage to be between 1,200 and 1,500 hours, and the monitor indicates that it has run 141 compensation cycles. This aligns with what we reported previously – about double the usage and about double the compensation cycles. We're still seeing around 9 to 10 hours of usage at 200 nits of brightness per compensation cycle.

As we mentioned in the last update, the recommended rate for panel protection cycles is every four hours, so in our typical usage, it's running less than half as often as is ideal. However, this is a totally realistic scenario for someone using this display for full-time work, especially if you don't put the monitor to sleep during breaks. We've set the display to sleep after two hours, which is far longer than we would recommend for general OLED use, but it's the same setting we used for our LCD.

• ·Thuyền chở 3 người đi xây lăng mộ chìm trong mưa lũ
• ·国足世预赛收官战23人名单：王钰栋穿10号 侯永永在列
• ·《三国志13：PK版》孩子特技培养攻略
• ·Cheap QLED TV deal: 50% off 65
• ·青马课堂：想要马儿好，就要马儿少吃草
• ·ROG Xbox Ally基础款和三年前的Steam Deck芯片相似
• ·Beats Studio Pro deal: Get 51% off at Amazon
• ·Windows XP用户配置文件丢失或损坏后的恢复方法
• ·Looking Back at 2010: The Year's Most Relevant Tech Stories
• ·Amazon Echo Buds deal: $15 off at Amazon
• ·คลังจ่อชงโครงการใช้งบกระตุ้น ศก. 1.57 แสนล้าน เข้าบอร์ดใหญ่ภายใน 2 สัปดาห์
• ·Quốc hội bắt đầu họp đợt 2, bàn về sáp nhập tỉnh
• ·这一波“小鬼”王琳凯巴黎街拍 吹爆国货尔克奇弹
• ·CentOS 6.4 最新安装教程（附下载地址）
• ·bak是什么文件？bak文件怎么打开
• ·Bose Ultra Open earbuds: $50 off at Amazon