We've been using the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED exclusively as a productivity monitor for the last six months,关键字3 and it's time to check in to see how the panel is holding up in terms of burn-in. Not much has changed in how we've been using this monitor – we've really been pushing it with a worst-case usage scenario for OLED – but there have been a few changes compared to the last time we checked for burn-in.

If you missed the last two updates, we recommend going back and checking out at least the initial article to get an idea of the setup we're using and why we've chosen MSI's 4K 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor as our workstation display.

Essentially, the idea here is to perform a real-world test of OLED longevity in the worst possible configuration, effectively burning in the display on purpose. We swapped a 32-inch 4K IPS LCD for this new QD-OLED and changed nothing else about the setup – no dark mode, no screensavers, or anything like that – to see if OLED monitors can truly be used as LCD-equivalent productivity displays long-term.

I use my monitor more than 8 hours a day, sometimes continuously, with no breaks for the display to turn off and rest. This leads to hours upon hours of static usage in applications like web browsers, Microsoft Office (including Excel), and production tasks like Adobe Premiere and Photoshop. With virtually no content consumption and zero gaming in our daily use of this display, this is not how we recommend usingan OLED at all, though it's a use case that has been perfectly fine for LCDs for a long time.

After one month of usage, the MSI 321URX showed no signs of burn-in at all, which was expected. At that point, we'd used the monitor for about 200 to 250 hours. After three months, we started to see faint signs of burn-in, and by that time, we'd used the display for approximately 650 to 750 hours with 71 panel compensation cycles.

Six months into this experiment, we estimate the usage to be between 1,200 and 1,500 hours, and the monitor indicates that it has run 141 compensation cycles. This aligns with what we reported previously – about double the usage and about double the compensation cycles. We're still seeing around 9 to 10 hours of usage at 200 nits of brightness per compensation cycle.

As we mentioned in the last update, the recommended rate for panel protection cycles is every four hours, so in our typical usage, it's running less than half as often as is ideal. However, this is a totally realistic scenario for someone using this display for full-time work, especially if you don't put the monitor to sleep during breaks. We've set the display to sleep after two hours, which is far longer than we would recommend for general OLED use, but it's the same setting we used for our LCD.

• ·地下城堡4骑士与破碎编年史墓穴90层零氪打法
• ·儿童睡前童话小故事（范本36篇）
• ·South America proposes unique 64
• ·高中必读书目2025最新公布 必读的十本课外书
• ·电影《平原上的火焰》预售开启 犯罪狠片暌违四年重燃大银幕！
• ·汤姆猫英雄跑酷获取钻石途径一览 汤姆猫英雄跑酷怎么获取钻石
• ·中国经济总量首破80万亿元 2017年国内生产总值概况
• ·湛江3地发布台风红色预警信号！广东西部有暴雨到大暴雨
• ·黑色信标猴子打字机活动玩法说明
• ·Is Ray Tracing Worth the FPS Hit? 36 Game Performance Investigation
• ·《天涯月》(乌兰托娅演唱)的文本歌词及LRC歌词
• ·高考英语作文：母亲的眼睛
• ·崩坏3薇塔武器搭配推荐 崩坏3薇塔武器怎么搭配
• ·高考英语作文：提高健康的方法
• ·荒野起源矿物冶炼方法攻略分享
• ·Hàng trăm du khách bị mời ra khỏi phố cà phê đường tàu trong đêm